GreatSchools: Involved Parents. Successful Kids
  EOG Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
Data not available for this school (2007)
Data not available for this school (2006)
The state average for Reading was 82% in 2007.

Math
Data not available for this school (2007)
Data not available for this school (2006)
The state average for Math was 71% in 2007.

Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 4

Reading
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 85% in 2007.

Math
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Math was 68% in 2007.

Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 5

Reading
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 89% in 2007.

Math
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Math was 67% in 2007.

Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 6

Reading
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 83% in 2007.

Math
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Math was 65% in 2007.

Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 7

Reading
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 86% in 2007.

Math
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Math was 64% in 2007.

Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 8

Reading
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 88% in 2007.

Math
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
The state average for Math was 65% in 2007.

Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 in reading and math.
  • The EOG is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  EOG Results by Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
Subgroup results not available

MathThis School
Subgroup results not available
Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students>95%
Female>95%
Male>95%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities>95%
Non-disabled students>95%

MathThis School
All Students>95%
Female94%
Male>95%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities85%
Non-disabled students>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students>95%
Female>95%
Male>95%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities>95%
Non-disabled students>95%

MathThis School
All Students>95%
Female95%
Male>95%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities92%
Non-disabled students>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students>95%
Female>95%
Male>95%
Black>95%
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities>95%
Non-disabled students>95%

MathThis School
All Students>95%
Female94%
Male>95%
Black71%
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities85%
Non-disabled students>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 7
ReadingThis School
All Students>95%
Female>95%
Male>95%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities>95%
Non-disabled students>95%

MathThis School
All Students>95%
Female>95%
Male>95%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities91%
Non-disabled students>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

Grade 8
ReadingThis School
All Students>95%
Female>95%
Male>95%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities>95%
Non-disabled students>95%

MathThis School
All Students>95%
Female>95%
Male>95%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
American Indiann/a
White>95%
Not free and reduced-price lunch>95%
Students with disabilities>95%
Non-disabled students>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 in reading and math.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview  

Back to top >
  EOC Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Algebra I
 >95% (2007)
 >=95% (2006)
Data not available for this school (2005)
Data not available for this school (2004)
The state average for Algebra I was 67% in 2007.

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in algebra I, algebra II, English I, biology, civics and economics, United States history and geometry.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  ABCs Accountability Program

This school received the designation of "Honor School of Excellence, High Growth" by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction for the 2006-2007 school year. In 2005-2006, this school received the designation of "Honor School of Excellence, High Growth".
Source: NCDPI, 2006-2007

About the ABCs Accountability Program

  • North Carolina uses the ABCs designations to show how well schools are performing against the state standards.
  • The ABCs designations are based on the percentage of students who tested at or above grade level on state standardized tests and whether students made the amount of growth expected in one year. For high schools, graduation-related factors are also included.
  • Schools receive one of the following designations: High Growth, Expected Growth, No Recognition, Priority School or Low-Performing. Schools that meet or exceed the state's growth goals can earn the following additional designations for commendable performance: Honor School of Excellence, School of Excellence, School of Distinction or School of Progress.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

Compare with ABCs from nearby schools  

Back to top >
How challenging is Magellan Charter School?