Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 16% (2008)
 27% (2007)
 15% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 52% (2008)
 63% (2007)
 30% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 46% (2008)
 60% (2007)
 20% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 16% (2008)
 16% (2007)
 11% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 51% (2008)
 40% (2007)
 19% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 53% (2008)
 25% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 22% (2008)
 8% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 24% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 30% (2008)
 34% (2007)
 39% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 36% (2008)
 13% (2007)
 22% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 17% (2008)
 17% (2007)
 19% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 42% (2008)
 50% (2007)
 31% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 39% (2008)
 27% (2007)
 28% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students16%
Female23%
Male10%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic15%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged16%
Students without disabilities17%
English language learners4%
Not English language learners25%

WritingThis School
All Students52%
Female52%
Male52%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic51%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged52%
Students without disabilities53%
English language learners30%
Not English language learners67%

MathThis School
All Students46%
Female56%
Male38%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic39%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged46%
Students without disabilities47%
English language learners30%
Not English language learners58%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students16%
Female11%
Male23%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic18%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged16%
Students without disabilities18%
Not English language learners25%

WritingThis School
All Students51%
Female48%
Male55%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic51%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged51%
Students without disabilities59%
Not English language learners53%

MathThis School
All Students53%
Female48%
Male58%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic56%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged53%
Students without disabilities61%
Not English language learners41%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students22%
Female21%
Male23%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic22%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged22%
Students without disabilities23%
Not English language learners29%

ScienceThis School
All Students24%
Female21%
Male27%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic22%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged24%
Students without disabilities26%
Not English language learners35%

WritingThis School
All Students30%
Female44%
Male17%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic32%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged30%
Students without disabilities34%
Not English language learners33%

MathThis School
All Students36%
Female42%
Male31%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic37%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged36%
Students without disabilities42%
Not English language learners41%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students17%
Male18%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic15%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged17%
Students without disabilities18%
Not English language learners29%

WritingThis School
All Students42%
Male36%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic36%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged42%
Students without disabilities44%
Not English language learners52%

MathThis School
All Students39%
Male48%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic37%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged39%
Students without disabilities42%
Not English language learners48%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Dr. Ramon E. Betances School?

Rocket Fuel