Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 34% (2008)
 33% (2007)
 32% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 67% (2008)
 66% (2007)
 64% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 57% (2008)
 56% (2007)
 57% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 35% (2008)
 30% (2007)
 34% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 67% (2008)
 63% (2007)
 52% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 74% (2008)
 62% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 45% (2008)
 30% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 50% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 77% (2008)
 68% (2007)
 71% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 54% (2008)
 62% (2007)
 61% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 54% (2008)
 35% (2007)
 48% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 77% (2008)
 55% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 69% (2008)
 52% (2007)
 58% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students34%
Female30%
Male39%
Black41%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic24%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged34%
Students without disabilities37%
Not English language learners41%

WritingThis School
All Students67%
Female64%
Male71%
Black78%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic50%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged67%
Students without disabilities70%
Not English language learners80%

MathThis School
All Students57%
Female50%
Male65%
Black70%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic36%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged57%
Students without disabilities59%
Not English language learners72%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students35%
Female48%
Black36%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged35%
Students without disabilities39%
Not English language learners35%

WritingThis School
All Students67%
Female92%
Black75%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged67%
Students without disabilities74%
Not English language learners67%

MathThis School
All Students74%
Female82%
Black80%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged74%
Students without disabilities80%
Not English language learners76%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students45%
Female43%
Male46%
Black44%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic43%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged45%
Students without disabilities54%
Not English language learners50%

ScienceThis School
All Students50%
Female39%
Male61%
Black56%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic43%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged50%
Students without disabilities59%
Not English language learners55%

WritingThis School
All Students77%
Female75%
Male79%
Black84%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic73%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged77%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners82%

MathThis School
All Students54%
Female54%
Male54%
Black52%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic53%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged54%
Students without disabilities61%
Not English language learners61%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students54%
Male58%
Black55%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged54%
Students without disabilities70%
Not English language learners63%

WritingThis School
All Students77%
Male69%
Black80%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged77%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners81%

MathThis School
All Students69%
Male73%
Black80%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged69%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners78%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Wish School?