Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 48% (2008)
 37% (2007)
 52% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 74% (2008)
 66% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 56% (2008)
 64% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 56% (2008)
 44% (2007)
 47% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 88% (2008)
 75% (2007)
 66% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 66% (2008)
 58% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 54% (2008)
 44% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 56% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 78% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 66% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 63% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 62% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 55% (2008)
 59% (2007)
 45% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 85% (2008)
 72% (2007)
 61% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 75% (2008)
 67% (2007)
 59% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students48%
Female48%
Male48%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic44%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged48%
Students without disabilities49%
Not English language learners59%

WritingThis School
All Students74%
Female81%
Male62%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic72%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged74%
Students without disabilities77%
Not English language learners82%

MathThis School
All Students56%
Female52%
Male62%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic50%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged56%
Students without disabilities58%
Not English language learners62%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students56%
Female61%
Male50%
Black45%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic57%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged56%
Students without disabilities59%
Not English language learners59%

WritingThis School
All Students88%
Female86%
Male90%
Black85%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic87%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners91%

MathThis School
All Students66%
Female65%
Male67%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic65%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged66%
Students without disabilities70%
Not English language learners69%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students54%
Female50%
Male59%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic56%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged54%
Students without disabilities61%
Not English language learners59%

ScienceThis School
All Students56%
Female49%
Male65%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic57%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged56%
Students without disabilities58%
Not English language learners56%

WritingThis School
All Students78%
Female83%
Male72%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic77%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged78%
Students without disabilities82%
Not English language learners80%

MathThis School
All Students63%
Female63%
Male63%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic64%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged63%
Students without disabilities64%
Not English language learners64%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students55%
Female58%
Male50%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic57%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged55%
Students without disabilities60%
Not English language learners58%

WritingThis School
All Students85%
Female94%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic89%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged85%
Students without disabilities94%
Not English language learners91%

MathThis School
All Students75%
Female74%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic76%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged75%
Students without disabilities76%
Not English language learners83%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Parkville Community School?

Rocket Fuel