Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 18% (2008)
 25% (2007)
 31% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 35% (2008)
 64% (2007)
 48% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 33% (2008)
 40% (2007)
 55% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 47% (2008)
 21% (2007)
 29% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 59% (2008)
 47% (2007)
 59% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 67% (2008)
 28% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 24% (2008)
 30% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 32% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 42% (2008)
 51% (2007)
 48% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 45% (2008)
 40% (2007)
 46% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 40% (2008)
 38% (2007)
 58% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 71% (2008)
 57% (2007)
 53% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 52% (2008)
 50% (2007)
 61% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students18%
Male13%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic14%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged18%
Students without disabilities21%
Not English language learners25%

WritingThis School
All Students35%
Male25%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic31%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged35%
Students without disabilities41%
Not English language learners50%

MathThis School
All Students33%
Male25%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic31%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged33%
Students without disabilities38%
Not English language learners43%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students47%
Female50%
Male43%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic42%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged47%
Students without disabilities51%
English language learners50%
Not English language learners45%

WritingThis School
All Students59%
Female69%
Male46%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic56%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged59%
Students without disabilities62%
Not English language learners59%

MathThis School
All Students67%
Female78%
Male54%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic68%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged67%
Students without disabilities69%
English language learners80%
Not English language learners60%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students24%
Female29%
Male21%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic21%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged24%
Students without disabilities28%
English language learners15%
Not English language learners28%

ScienceThis School
All Students32%
Female29%
Male35%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic30%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged32%
Students without disabilities38%
English language learners19%
Not English language learners38%

WritingThis School
All Students42%
Female53%
Male34%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic38%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged42%
Students without disabilities49%
English language learners20%
Not English language learners51%

MathThis School
All Students45%
Female40%
Male49%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic44%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged45%
Students without disabilities51%
English language learners40%
Not English language learners47%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students40%
Female50%
Male31%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic38%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged40%
Students without disabilities48%
Not English language learners47%

WritingThis School
All Students71%
Female85%
Male59%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic71%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged71%
Students without disabilities80%
Not English language learners81%

MathThis School
All Students52%
Female52%
Male52%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic57%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged52%
Students without disabilities60%
Not English language learners47%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is McDonough School?

Rocket Fuel