Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 31% (2008)
 27% (2007)
 24% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 54% (2008)
 42% (2007)
 51% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 55% (2008)
 33% (2007)
 36% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 29% (2008)
 27% (2007)
 26% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 68% (2008)
 47% (2007)
 57% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 42% (2008)
 37% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 29% (2008)
 25% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 57% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 53% (2008)
 43% (2007)
 71% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 47% (2008)
 25% (2007)
 48% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 31% (2008)
 35% (2007)
 38% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 52% (2008)
 53% (2007)
 56% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 30% (2008)
 53% (2007)
 46% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students31%
Female34%
Male28%
Black31%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged31%
Students without disabilities35%
Not English language learners31%

WritingThis School
All Students54%
Female62%
Male46%
Black52%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged54%
Students without disabilities57%
Not English language learners54%

MathThis School
All Students55%
Female63%
Male46%
Black54%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged55%
Students without disabilities61%
Not English language learners55%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students29%
Female35%
Male23%
Black29%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged29%
Students without disabilities35%
Not English language learners30%

WritingThis School
All Students68%
Female74%
Male61%
Black68%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged68%
Students without disabilities79%
Not English language learners67%

MathThis School
All Students42%
Female44%
Male39%
Black44%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged42%
Students without disabilities48%
Not English language learners42%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students29%
Female28%
Male30%
Black28%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged29%
Students without disabilities35%
Not English language learners30%

ScienceThis School
All Students57%
Female56%
Male58%
Black58%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged57%
Students without disabilities68%
Not English language learners56%

WritingThis School
All Students53%
Female58%
Male49%
Black52%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged53%
Students without disabilities59%
Not English language learners54%

MathThis School
All Students47%
Female42%
Male51%
Black49%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged47%
Students without disabilities57%
Not English language learners47%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students31%
Female39%
Male23%
Black33%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged31%
Students without disabilities39%
Not English language learners31%

WritingThis School
All Students52%
Female60%
Male43%
Black52%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged52%
Students without disabilities57%
Not English language learners52%

MathThis School
All Students30%
Female36%
Male23%
Black31%
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged30%
Students without disabilities37%
Not English language learners29%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is M. L. King School?

Rocket Fuel