Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 14% (2008)
 22% (2007)
 25% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 48% (2008)
 53% (2007)
 47% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 19% (2008)
 33% (2007)
 32% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 13% (2008)
 20% (2007)
 18% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 42% (2008)
 47% (2007)
 32% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 31% (2008)
 37% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 17% (2008)
 18% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 28% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 39% (2008)
 36% (2007)
 46% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 26% (2008)
 33% (2007)
 26% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 18% (2008)
 15% (2007)
 23% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 36% (2008)
 43% (2007)
 44% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 29% (2008)
 39% (2007)
 43% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students14%
Female14%
Male13%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic9%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged14%
Students without disabilities16%
English language learners4%
Not English language learners20%

WritingThis School
All Students48%
Female55%
Male38%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic41%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged47%
Students without disabilities54%
English language learners46%
Not English language learners49%

MathThis School
All Students19%
Female17%
Male22%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic14%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged18%
Students without disabilities22%
English language learners4%
Not English language learners28%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students13%
Female19%
Male7%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic12%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged13%
Students without disabilities15%
English language learners0%
Not English language learners21%

WritingThis School
All Students42%
Female42%
Male41%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic39%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged42%
Students without disabilities44%
English language learners18%
Not English language learners54%

MathThis School
All Students31%
Female29%
Male33%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic31%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged31%
Students without disabilities33%
English language learners0%
Not English language learners49%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students17%
Female23%
Male12%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic19%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged17%
Students without disabilities20%
English language learners7%
Not English language learners24%

ScienceThis School
All Students28%
Female38%
Male18%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic27%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged28%
Students without disabilities31%
English language learners4%
Not English language learners43%

WritingThis School
All Students39%
Female44%
Male33%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic39%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged39%
Students without disabilities44%
English language learners32%
Not English language learners43%

MathThis School
All Students26%
Female37%
Male15%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic25%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged26%
Students without disabilities29%
English language learners7%
Not English language learners38%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students18%
Female20%
Male16%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic16%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged18%
Students without disabilities22%
English language learners8%
Not English language learners27%

WritingThis School
All Students36%
Female49%
Male19%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic33%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged36%
Students without disabilities43%
English language learners26%
Not English language learners43%

MathThis School
All Students29%
Female32%
Male25%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic29%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged29%
Students without disabilities35%
English language learners21%
Not English language learners35%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Burns School?