Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 23% (2008)
 21% (2007)
 23% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 58% (2008)
 54% (2007)
 46% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 42% (2008)
 33% (2007)
 33% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 23% (2008)
 20% (2007)
 24% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 49% (2008)
 46% (2007)
 51% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 50% (2008)
 41% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 22% (2008)
 18% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 33% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 50% (2008)
 40% (2007)
 29% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 53% (2008)
 26% (2007)
 32% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 34% (2008)
 25% (2007)
 33% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 41% (2008)
 44% (2007)
 40% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 50% (2008)
 46% (2007)
 29% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students23%
Female26%
Male19%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic18%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged23%
Students without disabilities26%
Not English language learners28%

WritingThis School
All Students58%
Female68%
Male43%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic56%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged58%
Students without disabilities62%
Not English language learners69%

MathThis School
All Students42%
Female45%
Male38%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic39%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged42%
Students without disabilities47%
Not English language learners50%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students23%
Male29%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic24%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged23%
Students without disabilities28%
English language learners8%
Not English language learners40%

WritingThis School
All Students49%
Male44%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic47%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged49%
Students without disabilities57%
English language learners33%

MathThis School
All Students50%
Male61%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic51%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged50%
Students without disabilities56%
English language learners42%
Not English language learners60%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students22%
Female20%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic16%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged22%
Students without disabilities25%
English language learners9%

ScienceThis School
All Students33%
Female30%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic28%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged33%
Students without disabilities34%
English language learners18%

WritingThis School
All Students50%
Female60%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic47%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged50%
Students without disabilities53%
English language learners36%

MathThis School
All Students53%
Female55%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic50%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged53%
Students without disabilities56%
English language learners36%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students34%
Male27%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic32%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged34%
Students without disabilities45%
English language learners14%

WritingThis School
All Students41%
Male27%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic39%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged41%
Students without disabilities48%
English language learners19%

MathThis School
All Students50%
Male55%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanic47%
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged50%
Students without disabilities59%
English language learners36%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Barnard-Brown School?

Rocket Fuel