GreatSchools: Involved Parents. Successful Kids
  CST Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2

English Language Arts
 33% (2008)
 36% (2007)
 38% (2006)
 39% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 49% (2008)
 52% (2007)
 56% (2006)
 47% (2005)
The state average for Math was 59% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3

English Language Arts
 22% (2008)
 23% (2007)
 29% (2006)
 33% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 38% in 2008.

Math
 52% (2008)
 57% (2007)
 41% (2006)
 64% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

English Language Arts
 44% (2008)
 36% (2007)
 42% (2006)
 47% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 55% in 2008.

Math
 41% (2008)
 24% (2007)
 53% (2006)
 49% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Science
 23% (2008)
 16% (2007)
 19% (2006)
The state average for Science was 46% in 2008.

English Language Arts
 35% (2008)
 34% (2007)
 37% (2006)
 22% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 24% (2008)
 20% (2007)
 36% (2006)
 31% (2005)
The state average for Math was 51% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

English Language Arts
 46% (2008)
 30% (2007)
 29% (2006)
 23% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 47% in 2008.

Math
 33% (2008)
 31% (2007)
 23% (2006)
 25% (2005)
The state average for Math was 44% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools

The California Reading List: Helpful information to support your child's reading

 

Back to top >
  CST Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students33%
Females29%
Males37%
African American39%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino29%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)30%
Economically disadvantaged33%
Students with no reported disability35%
English learner35%
Fluent-English proficient and English only32%
Parent education - not a high school graduate20%
Parent education - high school graduate40%

MathThis School
All Students49%
Females40%
Males57%
African American43%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino57%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)48%
Economically disadvantaged48%
Students with no reported disability52%
English learner50%
Fluent-English proficient and English only48%
Parent education - not a high school graduate40%
Parent education - high school graduate51%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students22%
Females28%
Males17%
African American14%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)30%
Economically disadvantaged24%
Students with no reported disability24%
Fluent-English proficient and English only24%
Parent education - not a high school graduate26%
Parent education - high school graduate14%

MathThis School
All Students52%
Females55%
Males50%
African American43%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)63%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Students with no reported disability56%
Fluent-English proficient and English only53%
Parent education - not a high school graduate53%
Parent education - high school graduate48%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students44%
Females47%
Males41%
African American41%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino33%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)47%
Economically disadvantaged43%
Students with no reported disability47%
English learner50%
Fluent-English proficient and English only42%
Parent education - not a high school graduate59%
Parent education - high school graduate38%

MathThis School
All Students41%
Females53%
Males32%
African American31%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino47%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)43%
Economically disadvantaged41%
Students with no reported disability44%
English learner43%
Fluent-English proficient and English only41%
Parent education - not a high school graduate41%
Parent education - high school graduate40%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ScienceThis School
All Students23%
Females13%
Males32%
African American15%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino21%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)35%
Economically disadvantaged20%
Students with no reported disability25%
English learner0%
Fluent-English proficient and English only27%
Parent education - not a high school graduate18%
Parent education - high school graduate21%

English Language ArtsThis School
All Students35%
Females38%
Males32%
African American30%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino29%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)45%
Economically disadvantaged34%
Students with no reported disability38%
English learner20%
Fluent-English proficient and English only38%
Parent education - not a high school graduate36%
Parent education - high school graduate40%

MathThis School
All Students24%
Females21%
Males26%
African American15%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino29%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)33%
Economically disadvantaged23%
Students with no reported disability26%
English learner18%
Fluent-English proficient and English only24%
Parent education - not a high school graduate45%
Parent education - high school graduate21%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students46%
Females56%
Males35%
African American24%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino73%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)50%
Economically disadvantaged42%
Students with disability0%
Students with no reported disability58%
Fluent-English proficient and English only46%
Parent education - not a high school graduate43%
Parent education - high school graduate49%

MathThis School
All Students33%
Females39%
Males26%
African American18%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino45%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)38%
Economically disadvantaged28%
Students with disability0%
Students with no reported disability42%
Fluent-English proficient and English only34%
Parent education - not a high school graduate29%
Parent education - high school graduate34%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results
 
Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3

Reading
 29% (2008)
 41% (2007)
 37% (2006)
 50% (2005)
The state average for Reading was 38% in 2008.

Math
 44% (2008)
 50% (2007)
 39% (2006)
 71% (2005)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students29%
Females38%
Males21%
African American19%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)43%
Economically disadvantaged33%
Students with no reported disability33%
Fluent-English proficient and English only31%
Parent education - not a high school graduate37%
Parent education - high school graduate23%

MathThis School
All Students44%
Females52%
Males36%
African American43%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)54%
Economically disadvantaged46%
Students with no reported disability50%
Fluent-English proficient and English only42%
Parent education - not a high school graduate47%
Parent education - high school graduate39%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  API Results
 
API Growth (2007-2008)

717 (2008 Growth)
708 (2007 Base)

  • The Academic Performance Index (API) system is based on year-over-year test score performance through a two-year cycle. The Base score is for the first year and the Growth score is for the second year.
  • Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school's test score performance improved between spring 2007 and spring 2008 (as reported in August 2008).
  • The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools.
 
API Growth Target (2007-2008)

-50-25 0255075100
  9 (2008 Growth result)
  5 (2008 Growth target)
 

  This School Elementary Schools That Met Targets Statewide
Met its 2008 schoolwide growth target Yes 78%
Met all subgroup growth targets Yes 59%
  • Each school is assigned an API Growth target by the state, determined by calculating 5% of the difference between the Base API and 800, or a minimum of 5 point growth. Schools with APIs at or above 800 must maintain a minimum API of 800.
  • To encourage schools to improve achievement for all students, the state computes APIs and sets improvement targets for the different student subgroups at the school.
  • The state reports APIs for schools that test a minimum of 85% of eligible students in any subject.

 
2008 API Growth By Subgroup

717
685
737
737
711
  All
Students
African American Hispanic White Socio-
econ. Dis-
advant.
  • The results shown here reflect the school's Growth API for the 2008-2009 school year for all students and for each of the major subgroups of students as reported by the state.
  • The 2008 API Growth is calculated using test score results from spring 2008.

2007 API Statewide Rank


  • The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school's API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range.
  • The 2007 Statewide Rank is based on the results of tests that students took in spring 2007.

2007 API Similar Schools Rank

  • To create the Similar Schools Rank, the California Department of Education compares this school's test scores to 100 schools across the state with similar demographic profiles.
  • California uses parent education level, poverty level, student mobility, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with API results from nearby schools

2007-2008 API subgroup results  

Back to top >
How challenging is Madison Elementary School?