GreatSchools: Involved Parents. Successful Kids
  CST Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2

English Language Arts
 73% (2008)
 57% (2007)
 46% (2006)
 54% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 78% (2008)
 73% (2007)
 66% (2006)
 72% (2005)
The state average for Math was 59% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3

English Language Arts
 37% (2008)
 18% (2007)
 43% (2006)
 34% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 38% in 2008.

Math
 78% (2008)
 64% (2007)
 71% (2006)
 67% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

English Language Arts
 59% (2008)
 59% (2007)
 46% (2006)
 68% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 55% in 2008.

Math
 69% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 67% (2006)
 71% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Science
 54% (2008)
 38% (2007)
 56% (2006)
The state average for Science was 46% in 2008.

English Language Arts
 64% (2008)
 38% (2007)
 58% (2006)
 45% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 66% (2008)
 58% (2007)
 80% (2006)
 66% (2005)
The state average for Math was 51% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

English Language Arts
 54% (2008)
 48% (2007)
 50% (2006)
 39% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 47% in 2008.

Math
 62% (2008)
 61% (2007)
 61% (2006)
 53% (2005)
The state average for Math was 44% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools

The California Reading List: Helpful information to support your child's reading

 

Back to top >
  CST Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students73%
Females89%
Males62%
African Americann/a
Asian80%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino47%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged69%
Non-economically disadvantaged83%
Students with no reported disability75%
English learner70%
Fluent-English proficient and English only85%
Parent education - declined to state73%

MathThis School
All Students78%
Females89%
Males71%
African Americann/a
Asian82%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino63%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged75%
Non-economically disadvantaged89%
Students with no reported disability80%
English learner74%
Fluent-English proficient and English only100%
Parent education - declined to state79%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students37%
Females49%
Males24%
African Americann/a
Asian46%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino11%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged25%
Non-economically disadvantaged58%
Students with no reported disability39%
English learner22%
Fluent-English proficient and English only56%
Parent education - declined to state36%

MathThis School
All Students78%
Females80%
Males76%
African Americann/a
Asian93%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino48%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged75%
Non-economically disadvantaged84%
Students with no reported disability79%
English learner71%
Fluent-English proficient and English only87%
Parent education - declined to state76%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students59%
Females63%
Males53%
African Americann/a
Asian71%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino42%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged55%
Non-economically disadvantaged69%
Students with no reported disability60%
English learner46%
Fluent-English proficient and English only81%
Parent education - declined to state58%

MathThis School
All Students69%
Females73%
Males63%
African Americann/a
Asian79%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino58%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged68%
Non-economically disadvantaged69%
Students with no reported disability70%
English learner59%
Fluent-English proficient and English only86%
Parent education - declined to state68%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ScienceThis School
All Students54%
Females49%
Males62%
African Americann/a
Asian62%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino47%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged50%
Non-economically disadvantaged58%
Students with no reported disability54%
English learner33%
Fluent-English proficient and English only73%
Parent education - declined to state53%

English Language ArtsThis School
All Students64%
Females69%
Males52%
African Americann/a
Asian82%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino47%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged53%
Non-economically disadvantaged79%
Students with no reported disability65%
English learner53%
Fluent-English proficient and English only73%
Parent education - declined to state63%

MathThis School
All Students66%
Females71%
Males57%
African Americann/a
Asian82%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino43%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged65%
Non-economically disadvantaged68%
Students with no reported disability70%
English learner58%
Fluent-English proficient and English only74%
Parent education - declined to state66%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students54%
Females58%
Males49%
African Americann/a
Asian69%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino24%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged52%
Non-economically disadvantaged62%
Students with no reported disability55%
English learner32%
Fluent-English proficient and English only75%
Parent education - declined to state54%

MathThis School
All Students62%
Females64%
Males59%
African Americann/a
Asian82%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino28%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged62%
Non-economically disadvantaged62%
Students with no reported disability63%
English learner45%
Fluent-English proficient and English only77%
Parent education - declined to state62%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results
 
Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3

Reading
 34% (2008)
 22% (2007)
 43% (2006)
 36% (2005)
The state average for Reading was 38% in 2008.

Math
 68% (2008)
 57% (2007)
 62% (2006)
 69% (2005)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students34%
Females44%
Males24%
African Americann/a
Asian37%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino21%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged23%
Non-economically disadvantaged55%
Students with no reported disability36%
English learner19%
Fluent-English proficient and English only54%
Parent education - declined to state32%

MathThis School
All Students68%
Females78%
Males59%
African Americann/a
Asian76%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino50%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged63%
Non-economically disadvantaged77%
Students with no reported disability71%
English learner54%
Fluent-English proficient and English only87%
Parent education - declined to state68%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  API Results
 
API Growth (2007-2008)

831 (2008 Growth)
805 (2007 Base)

  • The Academic Performance Index (API) system is based on year-over-year test score performance through a two-year cycle. The Base score is for the first year and the Growth score is for the second year.
  • Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school's test score performance improved between spring 2007 and spring 2008 (as reported in August 2008).
  • The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools.
 
API Growth Target (2007-2008)

-50-25 0255075100
  26 (2008 Growth result)
  Met Interim Performance Target of 800 (2008 Growth target)
 

  This School Elementary Schools That Met Targets Statewide
Met its 2008 schoolwide growth target Yes 78%
Met all subgroup growth targets Yes 59%
  • Each school is assigned an API Growth target by the state, determined by calculating 5% of the difference between the Base API and 800, or a minimum of 5 point growth. Schools with APIs at or above 800 must maintain a minimum API of 800.
  • To encourage schools to improve achievement for all students, the state computes APIs and sets improvement targets for the different student subgroups at the school.
  • The state reports APIs for schools that test a minimum of 85% of eligible students in any subject.

 
2008 API Growth By Subgroup

831
878
740
812
824
  All
Students
Asian Hispanic Socio-
econ. Dis-
advant.
English Language Learners
  • The results shown here reflect the school's Growth API for the 2008-2009 school year for all students and for each of the major subgroups of students as reported by the state.
  • The 2008 API Growth is calculated using test score results from spring 2008.

2007 API Statewide Rank


  • The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school's API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range.
  • The 2007 Statewide Rank is based on the results of tests that students took in spring 2007.

2007 API Similar Schools Rank

  • To create the Similar Schools Rank, the California Department of Education compares this school's test scores to 100 schools across the state with similar demographic profiles.
  • California uses parent education level, poverty level, student mobility, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with API results from nearby schools

2007-2008 API subgroup results  

Back to top >
How challenging is Excelsior Elementary School?