GreatSchools: The Parents' Guide to K-12 Success
  CST Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2

English Language Arts
 78% (2008)
 61% (2007)
 65% (2006)
 65% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 85% (2008)
 65% (2007)
 67% (2006)
 72% (2005)
The state average for Math was 59% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3

English Language Arts
 57% (2008)
 62% (2007)
 55% (2006)
 64% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 38% in 2008.

Math
 74% (2008)
 77% (2007)
 70% (2006)
 72% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

English Language Arts
 85% (2008)
 75% (2007)
 75% (2006)
 76% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 55% in 2008.

Math
 84% (2008)
 79% (2007)
 73% (2006)
 69% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Science
 60% (2008)
 56% (2007)
 56% (2006)
The state average for Science was 46% in 2008.

English Language Arts
 64% (2008)
 72% (2007)
 62% (2006)
 69% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 66% (2008)
 68% (2007)
 62% (2006)
 47% (2005)
The state average for Math was 51% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools

The California Reading List: Helpful information to support your child's reading

 

Back to top >
  CST Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students78%
Females78%
Males78%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino63%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)80%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Non-economically disadvantaged81%
Students with no reported disability84%
Fluent-English proficient and English only81%
Parent education - declined to state78%

MathThis School
All Students85%
Females85%
Males85%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino68%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)92%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Non-economically disadvantaged88%
Students with no reported disability90%
Fluent-English proficient and English only89%
Parent education - declined to state85%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students57%
Females60%
Males56%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino39%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)60%
Economically disadvantaged31%
Non-economically disadvantaged60%
Students with disability23%
Students with no reported disability61%
English learner25%
Fluent-English proficient and English only61%
Parent education - declined to state57%

MathThis School
All Students74%
Females67%
Males79%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino56%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)75%
Economically disadvantaged69%
Non-economically disadvantaged75%
Students with disability23%
Students with no reported disability80%
English learner67%
Fluent-English proficient and English only75%
Parent education - declined to state74%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students85%
Females91%
Males80%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino75%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)88%
Economically disadvantaged64%
Non-economically disadvantaged87%
Students with no reported disability88%
Fluent-English proficient and English only86%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state85%

MathThis School
All Students84%
Females89%
Males78%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino58%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)86%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Non-economically disadvantaged86%
Students with no reported disability87%
Fluent-English proficient and English only85%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state84%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ScienceThis School
All Students60%
Females52%
Males67%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino21%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)62%
Non-economically disadvantaged63%
Students with disability11%
Students with no reported disability68%
Fluent-English proficient and English only63%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state60%

English Language ArtsThis School
All Students64%
Females72%
Males57%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino29%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)68%
Non-economically disadvantaged66%
Students with disability11%
Students with no reported disability72%
Fluent-English proficient and English only67%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state64%

MathThis School
All Students66%
Females60%
Males69%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino21%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)68%
Non-economically disadvantaged68%
Students with disability17%
Students with no reported disability73%
Fluent-English proficient and English only68%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state65%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results
 
Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3

Reading
 59% (2008)
 59% (2007)
 57% (2006)
 53% (2005)
The state average for Reading was 38% in 2008.

Math
 73% (2008)
 74% (2007)
 71% (2006)
 80% (2005)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students59%
Females62%
Males58%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino39%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)62%
Economically disadvantaged46%
Non-economically disadvantaged60%
Students with disability18%
Students with no reported disability65%
English learner31%
Fluent-English proficient and English only62%
Parent education - declined to state59%

MathThis School
All Students73%
Females67%
Males76%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino50%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)76%
Economically disadvantaged38%
Non-economically disadvantaged77%
Students with disability24%
Students with no reported disability80%
English learner54%
Fluent-English proficient and English only75%
Parent education - declined to state73%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  API Results

2007 API Statewide Rank


  • The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school's API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range.
  • The 2007 Statewide Rank is based on the results of tests that students took in spring 2007.

2007 API Similar Schools Rank

  • To create the Similar Schools Rank, the California Department of Education compares this school's test scores to 100 schools across the state with similar demographic profiles.
  • California uses parent education level, poverty level, student mobility, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.

 
2007 API Base By Subgroup

869
883
  All
Students
White
  • The results shown here reflect the school's Base API for the 2007-2008 school year for all students and for each of the major subgroups of students as reported by the state.
  • The 2007 API Base is calculated using test score results from spring 2007.
 
API Growth (2006-2007)

859 (2007 Growth)
850 (2006 Base)

  • The Academic Performance Index (API) system is based on year-over-year test score performance through a two-year cycle. The Base score is for the first year and the Growth score is for the second year.
  • Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school's test score performance improved between spring 2006 and spring 2007 (as reported in August 2007).
  • The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools.
 
API Growth Target (2006-2007)

-50-25 0255075100
  9 (2007 Growth result)
  Met Interim Performance Target of 800 (2007 Growth target)
 

  This School Elementary Schools That Met Targets Statewide
Met its 2007 schoolwide growth target Yes 76%
Met all subgroup growth targets Yes 63%
  • Each school is assigned an API Growth target by the state, determined by calculating 5% of the difference between the Base API and 800, or a minimum of 1 point growth. Schools with APIs at or above 800 must maintain a minimum API of 800.
  • To encourage schools to improve achievement for all students, the state computes APIs and sets improvement targets for the different student subgroups at the school.
  • The state reports APIs for schools that test a minimum of 85% of eligible students in any subject.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with API results from nearby schools

2006-2007 API subgroup results

 

Back to top >
How challenging is George White Elementary School?