GreatSchools: Involved Parents. Successful Kids
  CST Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 6

English Language Arts
 65% (2008)
 65% (2007)
 62% (2006)
 70% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 47% in 2008.

Math
 58% (2008)
 60% (2007)
 64% (2006)
 61% (2005)
The state average for Math was 44% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7

English Language Arts
 73% (2008)
 72% (2007)
 72% (2006)
 71% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 49% in 2008.

Math
 60% (2008)
 61% (2007)
 70% (2006)
 66% (2005)
The state average for Math was 41% in 2008.

Algebra I
 96% (2008)
 95% (2007)
The state average for Algebra I was 80% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8

General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards)
 67% (2008)
 54% (2007)
 50% (2006)
 58% (2005)
The state average for General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards) was 31% in 2008.

Science
 78% (2008)
 69% (2007)
 63% (2006)
The state average for Science was 52% in 2008.

English Language Arts
 71% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 69% (2006)
 67% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 45% in 2008.

History - Social Science Grade 8 Cumulative
 71% (2008)
 65% (2007)
The state average for History - Social Science Grade 8 Cumulative was 36% in 2008.

Algebra I
 92% (2008)
 93% (2007)
 95% (2006)
 88% (2005)
The state average for Algebra I was 42% in 2008.

Geometry
 91% (2008)
 100% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Geometry was 84% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools

The California Reading List: Helpful information to support your child's reading

 

Back to top >
  CST Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 6
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students65%
Females71%
Males59%
African Americann/a
Asian81%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino35%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)68%
Economically disadvantaged38%
Non-economically disadvantaged69%
Students with disability10%
Students with no reported disability70%
English learner11%
Fluent-English proficient and English only68%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state65%

MathThis School
All Students58%
Females60%
Males54%
African Americann/a
Asian81%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino27%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)61%
Economically disadvantaged31%
Non-economically disadvantaged61%
Students with disability7%
Students with no reported disability62%
English learner11%
Fluent-English proficient and English only60%
Gifted and talented99%
Parent education - declined to state57%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students73%
Females79%
Males68%
African Americann/a
Asian86%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino71%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)72%
Economically disadvantaged49%
Non-economically disadvantaged76%
Students with disability39%
Students with no reported disability76%
English learner35%
Fluent-English proficient and English only75%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state73%

MathThis School
All Students60%
Females64%
Males57%
African Americann/a
Asian73%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino40%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)64%
Economically disadvantaged34%
Non-economically disadvantaged64%
Students with disability44%
Students with no reported disability62%
English learner27%
Fluent-English proficient and English only62%
Gifted and talented93%
Parent education - declined to state60%

Algebra IThis School
All Students96%
Females93%
Males100%
African Americann/a
Asian91%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)98%
Non-economically disadvantaged96%
Students with no reported disability96%
Fluent-English proficient and English only96%
Gifted and talented98%
Parent education - declined to state96%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8
General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards)This School
All Students67%
Females63%
Males69%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino56%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)69%
Economically disadvantaged57%
Non-economically disadvantaged68%
Students with disability22%
Students with no reported disability73%
English learner47%
Fluent-English proficient and English only68%
Parent education - declined to state66%

ScienceThis School
All Students78%
Females79%
Males77%
African Americann/a
Asian91%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino50%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)80%
Economically disadvantaged56%
Non-economically disadvantaged80%
Students with disability26%
Students with no reported disability82%
English learner42%
Fluent-English proficient and English only80%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state78%

English Language ArtsThis School
All Students71%
Females81%
Males63%
African Americann/a
Asian86%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino42%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)74%
Economically disadvantaged59%
Non-economically disadvantaged73%
Students with disability19%
Students with no reported disability76%
English learner26%
Fluent-English proficient and English only74%
Gifted and talented98%
Parent education - declined to state71%

History - Social Science Grade 8 CumulativeThis School
All Students71%
Females69%
Males73%
African Americann/a
Asian91%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino45%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)73%
Economically disadvantaged50%
Non-economically disadvantaged73%
Students with disability22%
Students with no reported disability75%
English learner26%
Fluent-English proficient and English only74%
Gifted and talented97%
Parent education - declined to state71%

Algebra IThis School
All Students92%
Females94%
Males90%
African Americann/a
Asian86%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)93%
Non-economically disadvantaged92%
Students with no reported disability93%
Fluent-English proficient and English only93%
Gifted and talented94%
Parent education - declined to state92%

GeometryThis School
All Students91%
Females93%
Males90%
African Americann/a
Asian92%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)90%
Non-economically disadvantaged91%
Students with no reported disability91%
Fluent-English proficient and English only91%
Gifted and talented95%
Parent education - declined to state91%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results
 
Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 7

Reading
 77% (2008)
 72% (2007)
 76% (2006)
 76% (2005)
The state average for Reading was 49% in 2008.

Math
 84% (2008)
 79% (2007)
 81% (2006)
 78% (2005)
The state average for Math was 52% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 7
ReadingThis School
All Students77%
Females81%
Males73%
African Americann/a
Asian89%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino62%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)78%
Economically disadvantaged54%
Non-economically disadvantaged80%
Students with disability50%
Students with no reported disability80%
English learner47%
Fluent-English proficient and English only79%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state77%

MathThis School
All Students84%
Females86%
Males83%
African Americann/a
Asian95%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino68%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)85%
Economically disadvantaged57%
Non-economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disability61%
Students with no reported disability86%
English learner53%
Fluent-English proficient and English only86%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state84%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  API Results
 
API Growth (2007-2008)

872 (2008 Growth)
862 (2007 Base)

  • The Academic Performance Index (API) system is based on year-over-year test score performance through a two-year cycle. The Base score is for the first year and the Growth score is for the second year.
  • Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school's test score performance improved between spring 2007 and spring 2008 (as reported in August 2008).
  • The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools.
 
API Growth Target (2007-2008)

-50-25 0255075100
  10 (2008 Growth result)
  Met Interim Performance Target of 800 (2008 Growth target)
 

  This School Middle Schools That Met Targets Statewide
Met its 2008 schoolwide growth target Yes 74%
Met all subgroup growth targets Yes 46%
  • Each school is assigned an API Growth target by the state, determined by calculating 5% of the difference between the Base API and 800, or a minimum of 5 point growth. Schools with APIs at or above 800 must maintain a minimum API of 800.
  • To encourage schools to improve achievement for all students, the state computes APIs and sets improvement targets for the different student subgroups at the school.
  • The state reports APIs for schools that test a minimum of 85% of eligible students in any subject.

 
2008 API Growth By Subgroup

872
945
771
878
794
690
  All
Students
Asian Hispanic White Socio-
econ. Dis-
advant.
Students with Disabilities
  • The results shown here reflect the school's Growth API for the 2008-2009 school year for all students and for each of the major subgroups of students as reported by the state.
  • The 2008 API Growth is calculated using test score results from spring 2008.

2007 API Statewide Rank


  • The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school's API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range.
  • The 2007 Statewide Rank is based on the results of tests that students took in spring 2007.

2007 API Similar Schools Rank

  • To create the Similar Schools Rank, the California Department of Education compares this school's test scores to 100 schools across the state with similar demographic profiles.
  • California uses parent education level, poverty level, student mobility, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with API results from nearby schools

2007-2008 API subgroup results  

Back to top >
How challenging is Aliso Viejo Middle School?