GreatSchools: Involved Parents. Successful Kids
  CST Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2

English Language Arts
 6% (2008)
 14% (2007)
 14% (2006)
 8% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 38% (2008)
 32% (2007)
 48% (2006)
 32% (2005)
The state average for Math was 59% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3

English Language Arts
 8% (2008)
 12% (2007)
 7% (2006)
 5% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 38% in 2008.

Math
 31% (2008)
 33% (2007)
 28% (2006)
 28% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

English Language Arts
 31% (2008)
 32% (2007)
 23% (2006)
 34% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 55% in 2008.

Math
 55% (2008)
 58% (2007)
 36% (2006)
 44% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Science
 28% (2008)
 23% (2007)
 30% (2006)
The state average for Science was 46% in 2008.

English Language Arts
 30% (2008)
 21% (2007)
 35% (2006)
 28% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 50% (2008)
 31% (2007)
 54% (2006)
 46% (2005)
The state average for Math was 51% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

English Language Arts
 35% (2008)
 28% (2007)
 31% (2006)
 29% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 47% in 2008.

Math
 46% (2008)
 41% (2007)
 44% (2006)
 39% (2005)
The state average for Math was 44% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools

The California Reading List: Helpful information to support your child's reading

 

Back to top >
  CST Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students6%
Females2%
Males9%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino6%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged6%
Students with no reported disability6%
English learner6%
Migrant education9%
Parent education - not a high school graduate7%
Parent education - high school graduate0%

MathThis School
All Students38%
Females34%
Males41%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino38%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged38%
Students with no reported disability38%
English learner39%
Migrant education57%
Parent education - not a high school graduate40%
Parent education - high school graduate29%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students8%
Females9%
Males7%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino7%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged8%
Students with no reported disability8%
English learner5%
Fluent-English proficient and English only31%
Migrant education0%
Parent education - not a high school graduate7%
Parent education - high school graduate0%

MathThis School
All Students31%
Females23%
Males38%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino29%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged30%
Students with no reported disability32%
English learner28%
Fluent-English proficient and English only46%
Migrant education16%
Parent education - not a high school graduate30%
Parent education - high school graduate21%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students31%
Females32%
Males29%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino31%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged31%
Students with no reported disability31%
English learner26%
Fluent-English proficient and English only53%
Migrant education25%
Gifted and talented75%
Parent education - not a high school graduate28%
Parent education - high school graduate36%

MathThis School
All Students55%
Females44%
Males68%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino55%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged55%
Students with no reported disability54%
English learner51%
Fluent-English proficient and English only73%
Migrant education50%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - not a high school graduate53%
Parent education - high school graduate59%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ScienceThis School
All Students28%
Females20%
Males38%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino28%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged28%
Students with no reported disability26%
English learner23%
Fluent-English proficient and English only47%
Parent education - not a high school graduate24%

English Language ArtsThis School
All Students30%
Females35%
Males25%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino31%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged31%
Students with no reported disability30%
English learner26%
Fluent-English proficient and English only47%
Parent education - not a high school graduate29%

MathThis School
All Students50%
Females50%
Males50%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino50%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged50%
Students with no reported disability49%
English learner47%
Fluent-English proficient and English only60%
Parent education - not a high school graduate51%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students35%
Females33%
Males38%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino35%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged35%
Students with no reported disability39%
English learner19%
Fluent-English proficient and English only59%
Migrant education19%
Parent education - not a high school graduate37%
Parent education - high school graduate36%

MathThis School
All Students46%
Females38%
Males55%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino46%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged46%
Students with no reported disability51%
English learner35%
Fluent-English proficient and English only63%
Migrant education38%
Parent education - not a high school graduate49%
Parent education - high school graduate43%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results
 
Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3

Reading
 5% (2008)
 14% (2007)
 18% (2006)
 13% (2005)
The state average for Reading was 38% in 2008.

Math
 20% (2008)
 27% (2007)
 30% (2006)
 32% (2005)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students5%
Females4%
Males7%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino5%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged5%
Students with no reported disability5%
English learner3%
Fluent-English proficient and English only23%
Migrant education0%
Parent education - not a high school graduate5%
Parent education - high school graduate0%

MathThis School
All Students20%
Females15%
Males24%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino19%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged20%
Students with no reported disability21%
English learner20%
Fluent-English proficient and English only23%
Migrant education8%
Parent education - not a high school graduate20%
Parent education - high school graduate21%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  API Results
 
API Growth (2007-2008)

662 (2008 Growth)
653 (2007 Base)

  • The Academic Performance Index (API) system is based on year-over-year test score performance through a two-year cycle. The Base score is for the first year and the Growth score is for the second year.
  • Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school's test score performance improved between spring 2007 and spring 2008 (as reported in August 2008).
  • The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools.
 
API Growth Target (2007-2008)

-50-25 0255075100
  9 (2008 Growth result)
  7 (2008 Growth target)
 

  This School Elementary Schools That Met Targets Statewide
Met its 2008 schoolwide growth target Yes 78%
Met all subgroup growth targets Yes 59%
  • Each school is assigned an API Growth target by the state, determined by calculating 5% of the difference between the Base API and 800, or a minimum of 5 point growth. Schools with APIs at or above 800 must maintain a minimum API of 800.
  • To encourage schools to improve achievement for all students, the state computes APIs and sets improvement targets for the different student subgroups at the school.
  • The state reports APIs for schools that test a minimum of 85% of eligible students in any subject.

 
2008 API Growth By Subgroup

662
662
662
654
  All
Students
Hispanic Socio-
econ. Dis-
advant.
English Language Learners
  • The results shown here reflect the school's Growth API for the 2008-2009 school year for all students and for each of the major subgroups of students as reported by the state.
  • The 2008 API Growth is calculated using test score results from spring 2008.

2007 API Statewide Rank


  • The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school's API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range.
  • The 2007 Statewide Rank is based on the results of tests that students took in spring 2007.

2007 API Similar Schools Rank

  • To create the Similar Schools Rank, the California Department of Education compares this school's test scores to 100 schools across the state with similar demographic profiles.
  • California uses parent education level, poverty level, student mobility, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with API results from nearby schools

2007-2008 API subgroup results  

Back to top >
How challenging is Fremont Elementary School?