GreatSchools: The Parents' Guide to K-12 Success
  CST Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2

English Language Arts
 50% (2008)
 55% (2007)
 40% (2006)
 27% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 59% (2008)
 56% (2007)
 50% (2006)
 59% (2005)
The state average for Math was 59% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3

English Language Arts
 22% (2008)
 18% (2007)
 22% (2006)
 25% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 38% in 2008.

Math
 53% (2008)
 39% (2007)
 53% (2006)
 57% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

English Language Arts
 23% (2008)
 27% (2007)
 38% (2006)
 23% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 55% in 2008.

Math
 26% (2008)
 38% (2007)
 56% (2006)
 40% (2005)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Science
 16% (2008)
 24% (2007)
 4% (2006)
The state average for Science was 46% in 2008.

English Language Arts
 25% (2008)
 22% (2007)
 22% (2006)
 16% (2005)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2008.

Math
 31% (2008)
 34% (2007)
 33% (2006)
 26% (2005)
The state average for Math was 51% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools

The California Reading List: Helpful information to support your child's reading

 

Back to top >
  CST Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students50%
Females53%
Males46%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino52%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged49%
Students with no reported disability51%
English learner51%
Fluent-English proficient and English only45%
Parent education - declined to state49%

MathThis School
All Students59%
Females60%
Males58%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino62%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged59%
Students with no reported disability60%
English learner59%
Fluent-English proficient and English only60%
Parent education - declined to state59%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 3
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students22%
Females23%
Males22%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino23%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged23%
Students with no reported disability24%
English learner7%
Fluent-English proficient and English only40%
Parent education - declined to state23%

MathThis School
All Students53%
Females45%
Males60%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino54%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged52%
Students with no reported disability55%
English learner28%
Fluent-English proficient and English only80%
Parent education - declined to state52%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students23%
Females24%
Males23%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino24%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged23%
Students with no reported disability22%
English learner9%
Fluent-English proficient and English only40%
Parent education - declined to state23%

MathThis School
All Students26%
Females18%
Males35%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino26%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged26%
Students with no reported disability26%
English learner19%
Fluent-English proficient and English only36%
Parent education - declined to state26%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ScienceThis School
All Students16%
Females13%
Males19%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino16%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged16%
Students with no reported disability16%
English learner4%
Fluent-English proficient and English only29%
Parent education - declined to state16%

English Language ArtsThis School
All Students25%
Females30%
Males21%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino25%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged26%
Students with no reported disability26%
English learner7%
Fluent-English proficient and English only43%
Parent education - declined to state26%

MathThis School
All Students31%
Females37%
Males26%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino32%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged31%
Students with no reported disability32%
English learner21%
Fluent-English proficient and English only41%
Parent education - declined to state31%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results
 
Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3

Reading
 18% (2008)
 13% (2007)
 11% (2006)
 25% (2005)
The state average for Reading was 38% in 2008.

Math
 42% (2008)
 36% (2007)
 46% (2006)
 50% (2005)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2008.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CAT/6 Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above the 50th percentile

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students18%
Females21%
Males16%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino19%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged18%
Students with disability0%
Students with no reported disability21%
English learner13%
Fluent-English proficient and English only24%
Parent education - declined to state18%

MathThis School
All Students42%
Females40%
Males44%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino43%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged42%
Students with disability23%
Students with no reported disability45%
English learner29%
Fluent-English proficient and English only59%
Parent education - declined to state42%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 California used the California Achievement Test (CAT/6) to test students in grades 3 and 7 in reading, language, spelling and math.
  • The results for reading and math are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The CAT/6 is a norm-referenced test, which means it measures how well students in California scored in comparison to their peers across the country.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the 50th percentile (the national average) on the test.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
  API Results

2007 API Statewide Rank


  • The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school's API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range.
  • The 2007 Statewide Rank is based on the results of tests that students took in spring 2007.

2007 API Similar Schools Rank

  • To create the Similar Schools Rank, the California Department of Education compares this school's test scores to 100 schools across the state with similar demographic profiles.
  • California uses parent education level, poverty level, student mobility, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.

 
2007 API Base By Subgroup

726
725
725
701
  All
Students
Hispanic Socio-
econ. Dis-
advant.
English Language Learners
  • The results shown here reflect the school's Base API for the 2007-2008 school year for all students and for each of the major subgroups of students as reported by the state.
  • The 2007 API Base is calculated using test score results from spring 2007.
 
API Growth (2006-2007)

716 (2007 Growth)
713 (2006 Base)

  • The Academic Performance Index (API) system is based on year-over-year test score performance through a two-year cycle. The Base score is for the first year and the Growth score is for the second year.
  • Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school's test score performance improved between spring 2006 and spring 2007 (as reported in August 2007).
  • The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools.
 
API Growth Target (2006-2007)

-50-25 0255075100
  3 (2007 Growth result)
  5 (2007 Growth target)
 

  This School Elementary Schools That Met Targets Statewide
Met its 2007 schoolwide growth target No 76%
Met all subgroup growth targets No 63%
  • Each school is assigned an API Growth target by the state, determined by calculating 5% of the difference between the Base API and 800, or a minimum of 1 point growth. Schools with APIs at or above 800 must maintain a minimum API of 800.
  • To encourage schools to improve achievement for all students, the state computes APIs and sets improvement targets for the different student subgroups at the school.
  • The state reports APIs for schools that test a minimum of 85% of eligible students in any subject.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with API results from nearby schools

2006-2007 API subgroup results

 

Back to top >
How challenging is Madison Elementary School?