Image of pencil and books on table

 
  API Results
 
API Growth (2008-2009)

665 (2009 Growth)
594 (2008 Base)

  • The Academic Performance Index (API) system is based on year-over-year test score performance through a two-year cycle. The Base score is for the first year and the Growth score is for the second year.
  • Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school's test score performance improved between spring 2008 and spring 2009 (as reported in September 2009).
  • The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools.
 
API Growth Target (2008-2009)

-50-25 0255075100
  71 (2009 Growth result)
  10 (2009 Growth target)
 

  This School Elementary Schools That Met Targets Statewide
Met its 2009 schoolwide growth target Yes 78%
Met all subgroup growth targets Yes 59%
  • Each school is assigned an API Growth target by the state, determined by calculating 5% of the difference between the Base API and 800, or a minimum of 5 point growth. Schools with APIs at or above 800 must maintain a minimum API of 800.
  • To encourage schools to improve achievement for all students, the state computes APIs and sets improvement targets for the different student subgroups at the school.
  • The state reports APIs for schools that test a minimum of 85% of eligible students in any subject.

 
2009 API Growth By Subgroup

665
663
659
  All
Students
African American Socio-
econ. Dis-
advant.
  • The results shown here reflect the school's Growth API for the 2008-2009 school year for all students and for each of the major subgroups of students as reported by the state.
  • The 2009 API Growth is calculated using test score results from spring 2009.

2008 API Statewide Rank


  • The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school's API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range.
  • The 2008 Statewide Rank is based on the results of tests that students took in spring 2008.

2008 API Similar Schools Rank

  • To create the Similar Schools Rank, the California Department of Education compares this school's test scores to 100 schools across the state with similar demographic profiles.
  • California uses parent education level, poverty level, student mobility, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with API results from nearby schools

2008-2009 API subgroup results  

Back to top >
  CST Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2

English Language Arts
 29% (2009)
 11% (2008)
 15% (2007)
 15% (2006)
The state average for English Language Arts was 53% in 2009.

Math
 28% (2009)
 15% (2008)
 11% (2007)
 8% (2006)
The state average for Math was 63% in 2009.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 3

English Language Arts
 4% (2009)
 5% (2008)
 18% (2007)
 15% (2006)
The state average for English Language Arts was 44% in 2009.

Math
 35% (2009)
 14% (2008)
 25% (2007)
 35% (2006)
The state average for Math was 64% in 2009.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 4

English Language Arts
 32% (2009)
 17% (2008)
 12% (2007)
 21% (2006)
The state average for English Language Arts was 61% in 2009.

Math
 24% (2009)
 22% (2008)
 16% (2007)
 15% (2006)
The state average for Math was 66% in 2009.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 5

Science
 18% (2009)
 21% (2008)
 7% (2007)
 0% (2006)
The state average for Science was 49% in 2009.

English Language Arts
 32% (2009)
 22% (2008)
 25% (2007)
 8% (2006)
The state average for English Language Arts was 54% in 2009.

Math
 30% (2009)
 24% (2008)
 4% (2007)
 4% (2006)
The state average for Math was 57% in 2009.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the tests

  • In 2008-2009 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools

The California Reading List: Helpful information to support your child's reading

 

Back to top >
  CST Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 2
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students29%
Females33%
Males20%
African American26%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged27%
Students with no reported disability29%
Fluent-English proficient and English only34%
Parent education - declined to state30%

MathThis School
All Students28%
Females33%
Males20%
African American30%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged33%
Students with no reported disability32%
Fluent-English proficient and English only28%
Parent education - declined to state27%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 3
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students4%
Females8%
Males0%
African American3%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged3%
Non-economically disadvantaged7%
Students with no reported disability4%
Fluent-English proficient and English only4%
Gifted and talented6%
Parent education - declined to state4%

MathThis School
All Students35%
Females42%
Males30%
African American33%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged28%
Non-economically disadvantaged62%
Students with no reported disability40%
Fluent-English proficient and English only36%
Gifted and talented40%
Parent education - declined to state33%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 4
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students32%
Females36%
Males27%
African American38%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino25%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged29%
Non-economically disadvantaged42%
Students with no reported disability28%
English learner27%
Fluent-English proficient and English only33%
Parent education - declined to state32%

MathThis School
All Students24%
Females22%
Males26%
African American28%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino15%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged28%
Non-economically disadvantaged9%
Students with no reported disability22%
English learner25%
Fluent-English proficient and English only24%
Parent education - declined to state22%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 5
ScienceThis School
All Students18%
Females5%
Males28%
African American23%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged20%
Non-economically disadvantaged14%
Students with no reported disability21%
Fluent-English proficient and English only21%
Parent education - declined to state18%

English Language ArtsThis School
All Students32%
Females32%
Males32%
African American32%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged43%
Non-economically disadvantaged7%
Students with no reported disability36%
Fluent-English proficient and English only34%
Parent education - declined to state32%

MathThis School
All Students30%
Females25%
Males33%
African American24%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)n/a
Economically disadvantaged27%
Non-economically disadvantaged36%
Students with no reported disability33%
Fluent-English proficient and English only29%
Parent education - declined to state28%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the tests

  • In 2008-2009 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Maxwell Park International Academy?

Rocket Fuel