GreatSchools: The Parents' Guide to K-12 Success
Image of globe and book on table

Killingly School District

GreatSchools Rating: 5 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

369 Main Street
Danielson, CT 06239
Windham County
Map >

PH: (860) 779-6600

  • Grades PK-12
  • 2893 students
  • 5 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare schools in this district:


 CMT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 72% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 69% in 2007.

Writing
 81% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 82% in 2007.

Math
 81% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Math was 80% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 4

Reading
 71% (2007)
 79% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 71% in 2007.

Writing
 84% (2007)
 91% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 84% in 2007.

Math
 88% (2007)
 91% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 5

Reading
 80% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 73% in 2007.

Writing
 92% (2007)
 90% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2007.

Math
 90% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 6

Reading
 74% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 76% in 2007.

Writing
 81% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 84% in 2007.

Math
 85% (2007)
 81% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 7

Reading
 78% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 76% in 2007.

Writing
 87% (2007)
 81% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 81% in 2007.

Math
 77% (2007)
 77% (2006)
The state average for Math was 80% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 8

Reading
 79% (2007)
 77% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 76% in 2007.

Writing
 87% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2007.

Math
 83% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 CMT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students72%
Female77%
Male68%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White74%
Economically disadvantaged67%
Not economically disadvantaged75%
Students with disabilities32%
Students without disabilities77%
Not English language learners73%

WritingThis District
All Students81%
Female92%
Male70%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Economically disadvantaged79%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students with disabilities45%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners81%

MathThis District
All Students81%
Female86%
Male77%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Economically disadvantaged80%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students with disabilities36%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners82%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students71%
Female74%
Male69%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White74%
Economically disadvantaged65%
Not economically disadvantaged75%
Students without disabilities78%
Not English language learners72%

WritingThis District
All Students84%
Female93%
Male75%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged73%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners84%

MathThis District
All Students88%
Female89%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Economically disadvantaged80%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners87%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students80%
Female80%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Economically disadvantaged71%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students with disabilities41%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners81%

WritingThis District
All Students92%
Female96%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White92%
Economically disadvantaged87%
Not economically disadvantaged95%
Students with disabilities82%
Students without disabilities94%
Not English language learners93%

MathThis District
All Students90%
Female90%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged87%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students with disabilities50%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners90%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students74%
Female75%
Male74%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White75%
Economically disadvantaged65%
Not economically disadvantaged81%
Students with disabilities33%
Students without disabilities79%
Not English language learners75%

WritingThis District
All Students81%
Female89%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White81%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities52%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners81%

MathThis District
All Students85%
Female87%
Male84%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White86%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students with disabilities38%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners85%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students78%
Female79%
Male78%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White77%
Economically disadvantaged73%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students with disabilities46%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners79%

WritingThis District
All Students87%
Female94%
Male83%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White87%
Economically disadvantaged88%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students with disabilities60%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners88%

MathThis District
All Students77%
Female79%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White79%
Economically disadvantaged73%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students with disabilities33%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners77%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students79%
Female85%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Economically disadvantaged66%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students with disabilities36%
Students without disabilities86%
Not English language learners79%

WritingThis District
All Students87%
Female92%
Male82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged74%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students with disabilities50%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners87%

MathThis District
All Students83%
Female85%
Male81%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged79%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities45%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners83%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 CAPT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10

Reading
 71% (2007)
 71% (2006)
 72% (2005)
 72% (2004)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2007.

Science
 76% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2007.

Writing
 73% (2007)
 72% (2006)
 80% (2005)
 81% (2004)
The state average for Writing was 82% in 2007.

Math
 68% (2007)
 73% (2006)
 72% (2005)
 73% (2004)
The state average for Math was 77% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 CAPT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10
ReadingThis District
All Students71%
Female78%
Male61%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White71%
Economically disadvantaged67%
Not economically disadvantaged73%
Students with disabilities14%
Students without disabilities78%
Not English language learners71%

ScienceThis District
All Students76%
Female79%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White78%
Economically disadvantaged71%
Not economically disadvantaged79%
Students with disabilities38%
Students without disabilities81%
Not English language learners76%

WritingThis District
All Students73%
Female84%
Male58%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White73%
Economically disadvantaged66%
Not economically disadvantaged76%
Students with disabilities20%
Students without disabilities79%
Not English language learners73%

MathThis District
All Students68%
Female67%
Male70%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White69%
Economically disadvantaged56%
Not economically disadvantaged75%
Students with disabilities29%
Students without disabilities73%
Not English language learners68%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Student-Teacher Ratio
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
 This DistrictState Average
Students per FTE teacher1415

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
White, not Hispanic90%67%
Black, not Hispanic4%14%
Hispanic3%15%
Asian/Pacific Islander2%4%
American Indian/Alaskan Native<1%<1%
Student Economic Level
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
 This DistrictState Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program34%27%

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 
Spending Per Pupil
Information about this data
 This DistrictState Average
Total per pupil expenditures$12,213$12,716
Breakdown By Expenditure  
Instructional62%63%
Student and staff support9%8%
Administration11%10%
Other expenditures18%19%
Source: NCES, 2005-2006

Back to top >