GreatSchools: The Parents' Guide to K-12 Success
Image of globe and book on table

Hartland School District

GreatSchools Rating: 9 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

30 South Road
East Hartland, CT 06027
Hartford County
Map >

PH: (860) 653-7207

  • Grades K-8
  • 222 students
  • 1 school

View all schools in this district >

Compare schools in this district:


 CMT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 91% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 69% in 2007.

Writing
 100% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 82% in 2007.

Math
 100% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Math was 80% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 4

Reading
 96% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 71% in 2007.

Writing
 100% (2007)
 90% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 84% in 2007.

Math
 96% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 5

Reading
 85% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 73% in 2007.

Writing
 93% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2007.

Math
 93% (2007)
 96% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 6

Reading
 96% (2007)
Data not available for this district (2006)
The state average for Reading was 76% in 2007.

Writing
 100% (2007)
Data not available for this district (2006)
The state average for Writing was 84% in 2007.

Math
 100% (2007)
Data not available for this district (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 7

Reading
 91% (2007)
 94% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 76% in 2007.

Writing
 95% (2007)
 97% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 81% in 2007.

Math
 95% (2007)
 97% (2006)
The state average for Math was 80% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 8

Reading
 100% (2007)
 97% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 76% in 2007.

Writing
 100% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2007.

Math
 100% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2007.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 CMT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students91%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White91%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Not English language learners91%

WritingThis District
All Students100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Not English language learners100%

MathThis District
All Students100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Not English language learners100%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students96%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not economically disadvantaged96%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners96%

WritingThis District
All Students100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%

MathThis District
All Students96%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not economically disadvantaged96%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners96%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White92%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners85%

WritingThis District
All Students93%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White96%
Not economically disadvantaged93%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners93%

MathThis District
All Students93%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White96%
Not economically disadvantaged93%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners93%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students96%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White96%
Not economically disadvantaged96%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners96%

WritingThis District
All Students100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%

MathThis District
All Students100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students91%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Not English language learners91%

WritingThis District
All Students95%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not economically disadvantaged95%
Not English language learners95%

MathThis District
All Students95%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not economically disadvantaged95%
Not English language learners95%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%

WritingThis District
All Students100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%

MathThis District
All Students100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2006-2007

About the Tests

  • In 2006-2007 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Student-Teacher Ratio
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
 This DistrictState Average
Students per FTE teacher1215

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
White, not Hispanic93%67%
Asian/Pacific Islander3%4%
Hispanic2%15%
American Indian/Alaskan Native1%<1%
Black, not Hispanic<1%14%
Student Economic Level
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
 This DistrictState Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program0%27%

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 
Spending Per Pupil
Information about this data
 This DistrictState Average
Total per pupil expenditures$13,360$12,716
Breakdown By Expenditure  
Instructional55%63%
Student and staff support14%8%
Administration12%10%
Other expenditures19%19%
Source: NCES, 2005-2006

Back to top >