GreatSchools: Involved Parents. Successful Kids
Image of globe and book on table

Windsor Locks School District

GreatSchools Rating: 6 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

58 South Elm Street
Windsor Locks, CT 06096
Hartford County
Map >

PH: (860) 292-5000

  • Grades PK-12
  • 1952 students
  • 4 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare schools in this district:


 CMT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 64% (2008)
 62% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 80% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 80% (2008)
 82% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 69% (2008)
 75% (2007)
 67% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 84% (2008)
 79% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 79% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 78% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 85% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 84% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 90% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 85% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 75% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 72% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 83% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 87% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7

Reading
 84% (2008)
 76% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2008.

Writing
 82% (2008)
 82% (2007)
 85% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 80% in 2008.

Math
 88% (2008)
 89% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8

Reading
 74% (2008)
 89% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 77% in 2008.

Science
 71% (2008)
The state average for Science was 75% in 2008.

Writing
 83% (2008)
 93% (2007)
 86% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 81% (2008)
 86% (2007)
 85% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 CMT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students64%
Female72%
Male58%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White67%
Economically disadvantaged43%
Not economically disadvantaged74%
Students without disabilities69%
Not English language learners66%

WritingThis District
All Students80%
Female89%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Economically disadvantaged67%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities83%
Not English language learners82%

MathThis District
All Students80%
Female80%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners80%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students69%
Female72%
Male67%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White73%
Economically disadvantaged57%
Not economically disadvantaged74%
Students without disabilities75%
Not English language learners70%

WritingThis District
All Students84%
Female90%
Male79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White86%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners84%

MathThis District
All Students79%
Female85%
Male74%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White81%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners79%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students78%
Female78%
Male79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White81%
Economically disadvantaged72%
Not economically disadvantaged81%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners80%

ScienceThis District
All Students85%
Female85%
Male85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged75%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners86%

WritingThis District
All Students84%
Female89%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White87%
Economically disadvantaged77%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners84%

MathThis District
All Students85%
Female84%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged75%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners87%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students75%
Female75%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White79%
Economically disadvantaged66%
Not economically disadvantaged78%
Students without disabilities80%
Not English language learners76%

WritingThis District
All Students83%
Female84%
Male83%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White83%
Economically disadvantaged77%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners83%

MathThis District
All Students87%
Female86%
Male88%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged74%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students without disabilities94%
Not English language learners87%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students84%
Female91%
Male74%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged71%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners85%

WritingThis District
All Students82%
Female94%
Male67%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White83%
Economically disadvantaged79%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners82%

MathThis District
All Students88%
Female94%
Male79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Economically disadvantaged82%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities94%
Not English language learners88%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students74%
Female81%
Male67%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White75%
Economically disadvantaged69%
Not economically disadvantaged75%
Students without disabilities81%
Not English language learners74%

ScienceThis District
All Students71%
Female75%
Male67%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White75%
Economically disadvantaged53%
Not economically disadvantaged76%
Students without disabilities77%
Not English language learners71%

WritingThis District
All Students83%
Female94%
Male71%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged78%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners83%

MathThis District
All Students81%
Female86%
Male77%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Economically disadvantaged77%
Not economically disadvantaged83%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners81%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 CAPT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10

Reading
 82% (2008)
 87% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 83% in 2008.

Science
 77% (2008)
 87% (2007)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 93% (2008)
 91% (2007)
The state average for Writing was 88% in 2008.

Math
 78% (2008)
 81% (2007)
The state average for Math was 80% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 CAPT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10
ReadingThis District
All Students82%
Female93%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged61%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners82%

ScienceThis District
All Students77%
Female76%
Male77%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White83%
Economically disadvantaged57%
Not economically disadvantaged81%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners78%

WritingThis District
All Students93%
Female98%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White97%
Economically disadvantaged85%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners94%

MathThis District
All Students78%
Female75%
Male81%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White83%
Economically disadvantaged64%
Not economically disadvantaged81%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners80%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Student-Teacher Ratio
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
 This DistrictState Average
Students per FTE teacher1315

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
White, not Hispanic83%67%
Black, not Hispanic7%14%
Asian/Pacific Islander5%4%
Hispanic5%15%
American Indian/Alaskan Native<1%<1%
Student Economic Level
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
 This DistrictState Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program20%27%

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 
Spending Per Pupil
Information about this data
 This DistrictState Average
Total per pupil expenditures$12,989$12,716
Breakdown By Expenditure  
Instructional63%63%
Student and staff support8%8%
Administration7%10%
Other expenditures21%19%
Source: NCES, 2005-2006

Back to top >